Assistant Chief Transportation Officer, Service Delivery (Non-rep)

BART
Oakland, California United States  View Map
Posted: Mar 28, 2025
  • Salary: $185,624.00 - $281,222.00 Annually USD
  • Full Time
  • Accounting and Finance
  • Administration and Management
  • Transportation or Transit
  • Job Description

    Marketing Statement

    Ride BART to a satisfying career that lets you both: 1) make a difference to Bay Area residents, and 2) enjoy excellent pay, benefits, and employment stability. BART is looking for people who like to be challenged, work in a fast-paced environment, and have a passion for connecting riders to work, school and other places they need to go. BART offers a competitive salary, comprehensive health benefits, paid time off, and the CalPERS retirement program.

    Job Summary

    Pay Rate :
    Non-Rep Pay band 12:
    $185,624.00 (Annual Salary Minimum) - $281,222.00 (Annual Salary Maximum)

    *Initial salary will be between $228,823.00 - $242,717.00 annually to commensurate with education and experience.

    Reports To
    Chief Transportation Officer or designee

    Current Assignment
    The Assistant Chief Transportation Officer, Service Delivery is responsible for directing the operations of all department services and activities including management of the District's train service and station operations on assigned lines, managing the Transit Operations Division, which includes station and yard operations, providing oversight of the Transportation team ensuring safe, reliable, and timely service while providing great customer service.
    The Assistant Chief Transportation Officer, Service Delivery is also responsible for collaborating with Capital Projects Division and contractors to review and design expansion and enhancement projects from project development through final design, focusing on operational performance and safety.

    Selection Process

    Applications will be screened to assure that minimum qualifications are met. Those applicants who meet minimum qualifications will then be referred to the hiring department for the completion of further selection processes.

    The selection process for this position may include a skills/performance demonstration, a written examination, and a panel and/or individual interview.

    The successful candidate must have an employment history demonstrating reliability and dependability; provide copies of certificates, diplomas or other documents as required by law, including those establishing his/her right to work in the U. S; pass a pre-employment medical examination which may include a drug and alcohol screen, and which is specific to the essential job functions and requirements. Pre-employment processing will also include a background check. (Does not apply to current full-time District employees unless specific job requires additional evaluations).
    Application Process
    External applicants may only apply online, at www.bart.gov/jobs. Applicants needing assistance with the online application process may receive additional information by calling (510) 464-6112.

    Current employees are strongly encouraged to apply online, either at www.bart.gov/jobs , or on EmployeeConnect. Current employees may also apply using a BART paper application by delivering the completed form to the Human Resources Department, or by mailing it to P.O. Box 12688, Oakland, CA 94604-2688.

    All applicants are asked to complete the application in full, indicating dates of employment, all positions held, hours worked, and a full description of duties. Online applicants are invited to electronically attach a resume to the application form to provide supplemental information but should not consider the resume a substitute for the application form itself.

    Examples of Duties

    Assumes full management responsibility for all assigned lines, including providing strategic planning and leadership of operations and activities of passenger revenue rail services and station operations on assigned lines.

    Establishes appropriate service and staffing levels; monitors and evaluates the efficiency and effectiveness of service delivery methods and procedures; allocates resources accordingly.
    Manages and participates in the development and implementation of departmental goals, objectives, policies, and priorities for each assigned line/yard.
    Coordinates BART infrastructure building and Bus Bridges; partners with District departments for minimizing delays for track or station shut downs.
    Recommends and administers policies and procedures; reviews performance metrics and provides staff direct guidance based on metrics.
    Actively performs inspections of station and yard operations; meets with front-line staff to identify and resolve problems; identifies equipment issues that constrain station or train operations.
    Responds to emergencies, ensures staff is trained in Incident Commander duties in response to emergencies, and serves as liaison to police and fire departments.
    Approves site, specific work plans.
    Assesses staff compliance with rules and procedures; assures compliance and ride checks are completed timely; ensures non-compliant incidents are reviewed and appropriate action is taken to prevent incidents from reoccurring.
    Evaluates passenger services and station operations; ensures that staff provide high level customer service to District patrons and that all equipment is functioning properly.
    Partners with System Service department regarding station appearance and cleanliness program.
    Participate in security meetings; oversees station security programs to provide a safe operating environment for staff and patrons.
    Monitors developments related to station and facility operations; evaluates impact on District operations; recommends and implements policy and procedural improvements.
    Assists in the selection, motivation, and evaluation of assigned personnel; provides or coordinates staff training; works with employees to correct deficiencies; implements discipline and termination procedures.
    Participates in the development and administration of the department budget for assigned line; approves the forecast of funds needed for staffing, equipment, materials, and supplies; approves expenditures and implements budgetary adjustments as appropriate and necessary.
    Explains, justifies, and defends department programs, policies, and activities; negotiates and resolves sensitive and controversial issues.
    Represents the Transportation Department to other departments, elected officials, and outside agencies; coordinates assigned activities with those of other departments.
    Provides staff assistance to the Chief Transportation Officer; participates on a variety of boards, commissions, and committees; prepares and presents staff reports and other necessary correspondence.
    Attends and participates in professional group meetings; stays abreast of new trends and innovations in the field of transportation.

    Promptly responds to and resolves difficult and sensitive citizen inquiries and complaints.

    Minimum Qualifications

    Education :
    Possession of a bachelor's degree in Business Administration, Transportation, or a closely related field from an accredited college or university.

    Experience :
    The equivalent of seven (7) years of full-time professional verifiable experience in tower/control center operations, transportation operations, or closely related experience, which must have included the equivalent of at least two (2) years of management experience.

    Other Requirements :
    On call responsibility for managing assigned lines twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week.

    Substitution :
    Additional professional experience as outlined above may be substituted for the education on a year- for-year basis. A college degree is preferred.

    Knowledge and Skills

    Knowledge of :
    • Heavy rail systems and equipment and train station operations
    • Principles and practices of transit vehicle passenger safety
    • Safety principles pertaining to the operation of transit vehicles
    • Emergency procedures relating to transit vehicle operation
    • Policies and procedures for emergency response to fatalities, derailments, fired and major events
    • Equipment and systems used to monitor transit system operations
    • Methods and techniques of managing transit operations service delays and emergencies
    • Principles and practices of budget preparation and administration
    • Principles of supervision, training, and performance evaluation
    • Occupational hazards and standard safety practices
    • Related Federal, State, and local laws, codes, and regulations (i.e., OSHA, CPUC, etc.)

    Skill/ Ability in :
    • Participating in the management of a comprehensive transportation system
    • Supervising, training, and evaluating staff
    • Analysis of performance metrics
    • Participating in the development and administration of division goals, objectives, and procedures
    • Assisting in the preparation and administration of large program budgets
    • Preparing clear and concise reports
    • Responding to customer complaints
    • Researching, analyzing, and evaluating new service delivery methods and techniques
    • Interpreting and implementing emergency guidelines and procedures
    • Assisting in managing of transit delays and emergency response
    • Use of computers and supporting word processing and spreadsheet applications
    • Minimizing passenger delay and train disruptions
    • Analyzing problems, identifying alternative solutions, projecting consequences of proposed actions and implementing recommendations in support of goals
    • Interpreting and applying Federal, State, and local policies, laws, and regulations (i.e., APTA, OSHA, CPUC, etc.)
    • Communicating clearly and concisely, both orally and in writing
    • Establishing and maintaining effective working relationships with those contacted in the course of work


    Equal Employment Opportunity GroupBox1

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District is an equal opportunity employer. Applicants shall not be discriminated against because of race, color, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, gender expression, age (40 and above), religion, national origin (including language use restrictions), disability (mental and physical, including HIV and AIDS), ancestry, marital status, military status, veteran status, medical condition (cancer/genetic characteristics and information), or any protected category prohibited by local, state or federal laws.

    The BART Human Resources Department will make reasonable efforts in the examination process to accommodate persons with disabilities or for religious reasons. Please advise the Human Resources Department of any special needs in advance of the examination by emailing at least 5 days before your examination date at employment@bart.gov .

    Qualified veterans may be eligible to obtain additional veteran's credit in the selection process for this recruitment (effective Jan. 1, 2013). To obtain the credit, veterans must attach to the application a DD214 discharge document or proof of disability and complete/submit the Veteran's Preference Application no later than the closing date of the posting. For more information about this credit please go to the Veteran's Preference Policy and Application link at www.bart.gov/jobs .

    The San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART) prides itself in offering best in class benefits packages to employees of the District. Currently, the following benefits may be available to employees in this job classification.

    Highlights
    • Medical Coverage (or $350/month if opted out)
    • Dental Coverage
    • Vision Insurance (Basic and Enhanced Plans Available)
    • Retirement Plan through the CA Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS)
      • 2% @ 55 (Classic Members)
      • 2% @ 62 (PEPRA Members)
      • 3% at 50 (Safety Members - Classic)
      • 2.7% @ 57 (Safety Members - PEPRA)
      • Reciprocity available for existing members of many other public retirement systems (see BART website and/or CalPERS website for details)
    • Money Purchase Pension Plan (in-lieu of participating in Social Security tax)
      • 6.65% employer contribution up to annual maximum of $1,868.65
    • Deferred Compensation & Roth 457
    • Sick Leave Accruals (12 days per year)
    • Vacation Accruals (3-6 weeks based on time worked w/ the District)
    • Holidays: 9 observed holidays and 5 floating holidays
    • Life Insurance w/ ability to obtain additional coverage
    • Accidental Death and Dismemberment (AD&D) Insurance
    • Survivor Benefits through BART
    • Short-Term Disability Insurance
    • Long-Term Disability Insurance
    • Flexible Spending Accounts: Health and Dependent Care
    • Commuter Benefits
    • Free BART Passes for BART employees and eligible family members.


    Closing Date/Time: 4/10/2025 11:59 PM Pacific
  • ABOUT THE COMPANY

    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)
    • BART (Bay Area Rapid Transit)

    The BART story began in 1946. It began not by governmental fiat, but as a concept gradually evolving at informal gatherings of business and civic leaders on both sides of the San Francisco Bay. Facing a heavy post-war migration to the area and its consequent automobile boom, these people discussed ways of easing the mounting congestion that was clogging the bridges spanning the Bay. In 1947, a joint Army-Navy review Board concluded that another connecting link between San Francisco and Oakland would be needed in the years ahead to prevent intolerable congestion on the Bay Bridge. The link? An underwater tube devoted exclusively to high-speed electric trains.

    Since 1911, visionaries had periodically brought up this Jules Verne concept. But now, pressure for a traffic solution increased with the population. In 1951, the State Legislature created the 26-member San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit Commission, comprised of representatives from each of the nine counties which touch the Bay. The Commission's charge was to study the Bay Area's long range transportation needs in the context of environmental problems and then recommend the best solution.

    The Commission advised, in its final report in 1957, that any transportation plan must be coordinated with the area's total plan for future development. Since no development plan existed, the Commission prepared one itself. The result of their thoroughness is a master plan which did much to bring about coordinated planning in the Bay Area, and which was adopted a decade later by the Association of Bay Area Governments (ABAG).

    The BART Concept is Born
    The Commission's least-cost solution to traffic tie-ups was to recommend forming a five-county rapid transit district, whose mandate would be to build and operate a high-speed rapid rail network linking major commercial centers with suburban sub-centers.

    The Commission stated that, "If the Bay Area is to be preserved as a fine place to live and work, a regional rapid transit system is essential to prevent total dependence on automobiles and freeways."

    Thus was born the environmental concept underlying BART. Acting on the Commission's recommendations, in 1957, the Legislature formed the San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District, comprising the five counties of Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, San Francisco and San Mateo. At this time, the District was granted a taxing power of five cents per $100 of assessed valuation. It also had authority to levy property taxes to support a general obligation bond issue, if approved by District voters. The State Legislature lowered the requirement for voter approval from 66 percent to 60 percent.

    Between 1957 and 1962, engineering plans were developed for a system that would usher in a new era in rapid transit. Electric trains would run on grade-separated right-of-ways, reaching maximum speeds of 75-80 mph, averaging perhaps 45 mph, including station stops. Advanced transit cars, with sophisticated suspensions, braking and propulsion systems, and luxurious interiors, would be strong competition to "King Car " in the Bay Area. Stations would be pleasant, conveniently located, and striking architectural enhancements to their respective on-line communities.

    BART employees in the 1970s

    BART employees in the 1970s.

    Hundreds of meetings were held in the District communities to encourage local citizen participation in the development of routes and station locations. By midsummer, 1961, the final plan was submitted to the supervisors of the five District counties for approval. San Mateo County Supervisors were cool to the plan. Citing the high costs of a new system-plus adequate existing service from Southern Pacific commuter trains - they voted to withdraw their county from the District in December 1961.

    With the District-wide tax base thus weakened by the withdrawal of San Mateo County, Marin County was forced to withdraw in early 1962 because its marginal tax base could not adequately absorb its share of BART's projected cost. Another important factor in Marin's withdrawal was an engineering controversy over the feasibility of carrying trains across the Golden Gate Bridge.

    BART had started with a 16-member governing Board of Directors apportioned on county population size: four from Alameda and San Francisco Counties, three from Contra Costa and San Mateo, and two from Marin. When the District was reduced to three counties, the Board was reduced to 11 members: four from San Francisco and Alameda, and three from Contra Costa. Subsequently, in 1965, the District's enabling legislation was changed to apportion the BART Board with four Directors from each county, thus giving Contra Costa its fourth member on a 12-person Board. Two directors from each county, hence forth, were appointed by the County Board of Supervisors. The other two directors were appointed by committees of mayors of each county (with the exception of the City and County of San Francisco, whose sole mayor made these appointments).

    The five-county plan was quickly revised to a three-county plan emphasizing rapid transit between San Francisco and the East Bay cities and suburbs of Contra Costa and Alameda counties. The new plan, elaborately detailed and presented as the "BART Composite Report, " was approved by supervisors of the three counties in July 1962, and placed on the ballot for the following November general election.

    The plan required approval of 60 percent of the District's voters. It narrowly passed with a 61.2 percent vote District-wide, much to the surprise of many political experts who were confident it would fail. Indeed, one influential executive was reported to have said: "If I'd known the damn thing would have passed, I'd never have supported it. "

    The voters approved a $792 million bond issue to finance a 71.5 mile high-speed transit system, consisting of 33 stations serving 17 communities in the three counties. The proposal also included another needed transit project: rebuilding 3.5 miles of the San Francisco Municipal Railway. The new line would link muni streetcar lines directly with BART and Market Street stations, and four new Muni stations would be built.

    The additional cost of the transbay tube -- estimated at $133 million -- was to come from bonds issued by the California Toll Bridge Authority and secured by future Bay Area Bridge revenues. The additional cost of rolling stock, estimated at $71 million, was to be funded primarily from bonds issued against future operating revenues. Thus, the total cost of the system, as of 1962, was projected at $996 million. It would be the largest single public works project ever undertaken in the U.S. by the local citizenry.

    After the election, engineers immediately started work on the final system designs, only to be halted by a taxpayer's suit filed against the District a month later. The validity of the bond election, and the legality of the District itself, were challenged. While the court ruled in favor of the District on both counts, six months of litigation cost $12 million in construction delays. This would be the first of many delays from litigation and time-consuming negotiations involving 166 separate agreements reached with on-line cities, counties, and other special districts. The democratic processes of building a new transit system would prove to be major cost factors that, however necessary, were not foreseen.

     

    Show more

MORE JOBS

  • Public Safety Radio Dispatcher Trainee

    • San Jose, California
    • CITY OF SAN JOSE
    • Mar 15, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Dispatch and Telecommunications
    • Public Safety
  • Deputy City Marshal

    • Galveston, Texas
    • City of Galveston, TX
    • Feb 08, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Administration and Management
    • Municipal or County Clerk
    • Other
  • Director of Silicon Valley Power

    • Santa Clara, California
    • City of Santa Clara, CA
    • Mar 12, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Administration and Management
  • Infant/Toddler Master Teacher - Project

    • Contra Costa County, California
    • Contra Costa County, CA
    • Jul 14, 2024
    • Education and Training
  • Deputy Director of Emergency Services

    • Camarillo, California
    • County of Ventura
    • Mar 05, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Administration and Management
    • Emergency Management
    • Other
  • Assistant Environmental Health Specialist/Environmental Health Specialist I

    • Orange, California
    • Orange County, CA
    • Mar 07, 2025
    • Full Time
    • Accounting and Finance
    • Environmental Services
    • Public Health
    • Other
Show More
Apply Now Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.
Please mention you found this employment opportunity on the CareersInGovernment.com Job Board.